Kirrah Company makes a registered offering of its common shares under the Securities Act of 1933.A year after the offering,the federal government cancels a contract with Kirrah.The contract had provided and was expected to continue to provide 30 percent of Kirrah's business.The material risks section of the registration statement failed to state that the federal government provided 30 percent of Kirrah's business and that the federal government had the right to terminate the contract at any time.Among others,Amy Arston,the president and chief executive officer of Kirrah,is sued by purchasers of the shares under Section 11 of the Securities Act.What is Amy's due diligence defense under Section 11? Is Amy likely to be able to prove she met that defense?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q78: The "fraud-on-the-market-theory" used in some cases to
Q79: Which of the following is true about
Q80: Instead of litigating an SEC action,the SEC
Q81: A company is not required to disclose
Q82: Icarus Company is considering making an offering
Q84: Which of the following statements about the
Q85: A(n)_ is a person who is authorized
Q86: While auditing the financial statements of Merlyn
Q87: The offering price of a tender offer
Q88: Harmer Company has filed a registration statement
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents