Which perspective would argue that leaders' discourse about Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology made that pursuit seem like as a threat in the United States?
A) realism
B) liberalism
C) constructivism
D) radicalism

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Constructivism emphasizes the role of ideas, social norms, and discourse in shaping international relations. This perspective would argue that the way leaders talk about Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology can shape how it is perceived, and may have contributed to the perception of Iran as a threat in the United States. Realism and liberalism tend to focus more on material factors such as power and economic interests. Radicalism may emphasize the role of systemic inequalities or power structures, but is less likely to focus on discourse specifically. Therefore, constructivism is the best choice for this question.

Which Perspective Would Argue That Leaders' Discourse About Iran's Pursuit