How do realists argue human security issues have affected the primacy of the state?
A) They argue that state primacy is being jeopardized by these transnational issues.
B) They argue that the rise of these transnational issues has led to a need for global governance.
C) They argue that human security issues are not transnational in nature.The state is the main actor needed to deal with human security issues.
D) They argue that the increase in relevance of other actors to deal with these transnational issues does not necessarily lead to the elimination of state primacy.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Realists argue that human security issues have indeed affected the primacy of the state, but they do not believe that this necessarily leads to the elimination of state primacy. Realists argue that other actors, such as international organizations or non-state actors, may become more relevant in dealing with these transnational issues, but the state remains the primary actor in ensuring its own security and maintaining order within its borders. Realists do not believe that the rise of transnational issues necessarily leads to a need for global governance, and they may argue that human security issues are not solely transnational in nature.

How Do Realists Argue Human Security Issues Have Affected the Primacy