Clem had wanted a piano for a long time. Although he was a minor, his mom gave him $300 and he took this with some savings and made a $500 down payment on a $3000 piano. The balance was to be paid over a three-year period. His mom signed the contract as a guarantor. Clem made the first three payments, but he damaged the piano trying to move it from the living room to his upstairs bedroom. He didn't have the money to get it fixed. He quit playing, lost interest, and quit making his payments. On these facts, which of the following is false?
A) Although the contract is unenforceable against Clem, if he affirms the contract after he reaches the age of majority, the seller will be able to sue him for breach of contract.
B) Unless Clem affirms the contract or partly performs the contract after he reaches the age of majority, the seller cannot get any compensation from him.
C) If Clem's mother guaranteed the deal, she would be liable on her guarantee even if the contract were unenforceable against Clem.
D) Because Clem is an infant, he cannot sue the seller, even if the piano is defective.
E) Clem's mother will be liable on the guarantee only if it is in writing.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

EOption D is false because being an infant (minor) does not inherently prevent Clem from suing the seller if the piano were defective. Minors can initiate lawsuits through guardians or representatives.Option E is false because the requirement for a guarantee to be in writing depends on the statute of frauds applicable in the jurisdiction. However, the statement that Clem's mother will only be liable if the guarantee is in writing is not universally true, as oral guarantees can also be enforceable under certain conditions.

Clem Had Wanted a Piano for a Long Time