In Horizon Resource Management Ltd. V. Blaze Energy Ltd., one of the issues was whether Roll'n failed to comply with relevant legislation such that its contract was unenforceable due to illegality. After reviewing the law relating to illegal contracts and contracts performed illegally, the Court decided:
A) The breaches of legislation were willful and intentional and therefore the contract was void for illegality.
B) The breaches of legislation were willful and intentional and therefore the contract was not void for illegality
C) The contract was prohibited by legislation and therefore void for illegality
D) The contract was not prohibited by legislation and therefore enforceable and not void for illegality.
E) The contract was performed illegally and therefore unenforceable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court found that the contract was not prohibited by legislation, which means it was considered enforceable and not void due to illegality. This implies that despite any breaches of legislation, they did not render the contract itself illegal or unenforceable under the law.