In which of the following would the court find that the contract is void (i.e., not a binding agreement) ?
A) After some negotiation, Paul accepted Monafo's offer to sell him the painting for $5000. When the contract was put in writing, the price was incorrectly stated as $500. Monafo could prove the terms of the oral contract.
B) Two parties contracted for a tanker of oil, but unknown to either of them at the time of the contract, the tanker had caught on fire and all the oil had burned.
C) Kramer, thinking that the city was going to build a new school in the area, offered to buy a house. She had not talked with the seller or his agent about the possibility of a school. After the offer was accepted, she learned that there would be no such new school.
D) Joe bought pizzas, but after eating one he realized that purchasing them was a big mistake.
E) Ry and Ali, two parties to a contract, each had a different understanding about the term "royalties" in the contract. The court found Ali's interpretation the more reasonable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: When two parties are involved in a
Q37: Jones offers to sell Smith his car.
Q38: A woman sought to set aside a
Q39: The law attempts to help persons who
Q40: An 80-year-old woman signed, in the presence
Q42: In Moss v. Chin, Chin's insurer, ICBC,
Q43: Mike is given a bottle of wine
Q44: In AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc.,
Q45: In 978011 Ontario Ltd. v. Cornell Engineering
Q46: Misgana ran into Tarja at their local
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents