In RBC Dominion Securities Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, virtually all of the investment advisors at the RBC branch left without notice and went to work for a competitor, Merrill Lynch. What did the Court determine?
A) Merrill Lynch and its manager were found jointly and severally liable, as the manager had induced the breach of the duty not to compete unfairly.
B) RBC was found liable for inducement of breach of contract.
C) Merrill Lynch and its manager were not liable, since no notice of termination was required.
D) RBC investment advisors were not in violation of their fiduciary duty to RBC, and were not required to provide notice of termination.
E) Fiduciary duties cannot arise in the context of a mere employment relationship.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Why is the distinction between employment and
Q3: On Friday afternoon, Frieda was told not
Q4: For the past seven years, Hudson has
Q5: With regard to employment law, which of
Q6: Which of the following statements is correct
Q8: Which of the following is correct with
Q9: Which of the following is a false
Q10: Which one of the following is just
Q11: Which of the following is a true
Q12: If former employees are sued, it is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents