For the past seven years, Hudson has worked as vice-president in charge of personnel (a non-union position) for Mountain Enterprises Ltd. As part of a corporate reorganization, the directors of the company decided to downgrade Hudson's position to manager of personnel. Hudson is very upset at this change and consequently refuses to go along with it. Because of his refusal, the company dismisses him immediately without any notice or pay in lieu thereof. If Hudson sues for wrongful dismissal, which one of the following statements indicates the most likely outcome of the case?
A) The company will win because non-union employees are always subject to dismissal without notice, because there is no collective agreement.
B) The company will win because Hudson's refusal constituted cause.
C) The company will win because they dismissed him, rather than saying he was "fired."
D) Hudson will win because the company breached the employment contract and he does not have to accept that breach.
E) Hudson will win because an employer owes its employees a job, unless the employee is convicted of a theft.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Mr. Koff, a former policeman, was hired
Q2: Why is the distinction between employment and
Q3: On Friday afternoon, Frieda was told not
Q5: With regard to employment law, which of
Q6: Which of the following statements is correct
Q7: In RBC Dominion Securities Inc. v. Merrill
Q8: Which of the following is correct with
Q9: Which of the following is a false
Q10: Which one of the following is just
Q11: Which of the following is a true
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents