Solved

Match the U.S. Supreme Court Case to the Holdings

Question 57

Matching

Match the U.S. Supreme Court case to the holdings.

Premises:
Plessy v. Ferguson
Baker v. Carr
New York Times v. Sullivan
Marbury v. Madison
Miranda v. Arizona
Bush v. Gore
Brown v. Board of Education
Roe v. Wade
Mapp v. Ohio
Gideon v. Wainwright
Responses:
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Exclusionary Rule and made it applicable to states
A public official cannot recover damages for a false statement relating to official conduct without proof that the statement was made with actual malice
Recount procedures in an election must be standard from district to district or the procedures violate the Equal Protection Clause
The concept of separate but equal schools violated the Equal Protection Clause
A criminal defendant in a state case must be advised of various rights before being subjected to custodial interrogation
A state that required separate but equal facilities based on race did not violate the Equal Protection Clause
In a felony case in state court, the Fourteenth Amendment required an indigent defendant have the right to court-appointed counsel
The creation of voting districts violates the Equal Protection Clause if it is without any reasonable or logical formula and if it discriminates against any group
A state law banning abortion was unconstitutional because it violated the right to privacy implied in the Fourteenth Amendment
The Supreme Court has the power to review statutory law to determine if it is constitutional

Correct Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson
Baker v. Carr
New York Times v. Sullivan
Marbury v. Madison
Miranda v. Arizona
Bush v. Gore
Brown v. Board of Education
Roe v. Wade
Mapp v. Ohio
Gideon v. Wainwright
Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents