Many have argued that Milgram's classic research on obedience to authority was unethical. Indeed, Milgram's research provided much of the impetus for the implementation of ethics committees and research review boards in universities. Why? What was the chief complaint?
A) None of the participants were ever fully debriefed.
B) The so-called "learner" could have been seriously physically injured.
C) The so-called "learner" had a heart condition, and more precautions should have been taken to prevent possible permanent damage to his heart.
D) Participants could have experienced intense, long-term emotional, or psychological trauma.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The chief complaint was that participants could have experienced intense, long-term emotional, or psychological trauma due to the significant stress and pressure placed on them during the experiment. Milgram's research involved deceiving participants and putting them under significant stress, potentially causing lasting psychological damage. This was seen as highly unethical and led to new regulations around research ethics.

Many Have Argued That Milgram's Classic Research on Obedience to Authority