Smith & Jones rendered an unmodified auditor's opinion on the financial report of a company that sold shares in a public offering. Based on a false statement in the financial report, Smith & Jones is being sued by an investor
Who purchased shares in this public offering. Which of the following represents a viable defence?
A) The investor has not met the burden of proving fraud or negligence by Smith & Jones.
B) The false statement is immaterial in the overall context of the financial report.
C) Detection of the false statement by Smith & Jones occurred after the date of the auditor's report.
D) The investor did not actually rely upon the false statement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: An auditor discovers a likely fraud during
Q13: A claim for a breach of duty
Q14: FMC Electronics Ltd engaged the accounting firm
Q15: Mars Ltd wished to acquire the ordinary
Q19: The 'Second Report of the Inquiry into
Q20: ASA 240 (ISA 240) provides that primary
Q21: The AWA case established that:
A)reasonable care and
Q21: The auditor should assess the risk that
Q22: In the Caparo case, the court held
Q26: An auditor's duty of care to a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents