As initially proposed,Spearman's "g" factor and Thurstone's set of "primary mental ability" factors were not compatible with one another.Which of the following accurately describes subsequent research findings on this issue?
A) Thurstone's factors are largely unnecessary,because they can be almost fully explained by the g factor.
B) No substantial g factor really exists,and Thurstone's factors are mutually unrelated aspects of mental ability.
C) Both the g factor and the several additional factors are needed,but g is larger and more important than any other factor.
D) Both the g factor and the several additional factors are needed,but g is smaller and less important than most of the other factors.
E) None of the above;research findings have not resolved this issue.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: According to the findings of most research
Q2: Which of the following was NOT among
Q3: What are the typical findings observed with
Q4: Which of the following results,as observed in
Q6: Spearman concluded that "g" (i.e. ,"general intelligence")was
Q7: Previous research has indicated that low levels
Q8: When Binet began developing intelligence tests in
Q9: Much research has examined the relations between
Q10: According to a recent review of research
Q11: Which of the following accurately summarizes the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents