Ayush owned property which he discovered was contaminated with hazardous waste.He learned that Bayle Inc.had owned the property thirty years earlier,and had used it as a disposal site for manufacturing chemicals.Ayush also learned that Solly Trucking Inc.had hauled the chemicals to the site under contract with Bayle.Under these circumstances,which of the parties can be liable for the costs of cleaning up the site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act (CERCLA) ?
A) Only Bayle is potentially liable under the CERCLA.
B) Only Ayush is potentially liable under the CERCLA.
C) Only Bayle and Solly are potentially liable under the CERCLA.
D) Ayush, Bayle, and Solly are all potentially liable under the CERCLA.
Under the given circumstances, Ayush, Bayle Inc., and Solly Trucking Inc. are all potentially liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA.) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority to require that a site be cleaned up by those persons who were responsible for it, either as the owner or operator of the site, a transporter of wastes to the site, or the owner of wastes deposited at the site.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: The primary responsibility for enforcing air quality
Q42: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)requires
Q43: When is a discharge permit required under
Q44: "Community Right to Know" legislation:
A) requires an
Q45: What is the consequence of placing a
Q47: Explain the Clean Air Act's approach for
Q48: Describe Superfund's "Community Right to Know" requirement.
Q49: The NIMBY or not-in-my-backyard refers to:
A) a
Q50: What are the major requirements a person
Q50: Employees of a company that illegally disposes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents