In the case of Hamilton v.Lanning,the court:
A) stated that the Bankruptcy Code did not define the term "projected disposable income" until enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.
B) dealt with the issue of liquidation of nonexempt assets under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
C) found that when a bankruptcy court calculates a Chapter 13 debtor's projected disposable income, the court may adjust for changes in the debtor's income or expenses that are virtually certain instead of using a mechanical approach.
D) agreed with the petitioner's argument that a debtor's projected disposable income should be determined using a mechanical approach of multiplying past average monthly disposable income by the number of months in a debtor's plan.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q73: Which of the following claims will be
Q78: All of the following are dischargeable in
Q81: The Packer Video Company files for Chapter
Q82: Under Chapter _, the bankruptcy estate does
Q86: In bankruptcy law, an insider may include:
A)
Q87: Chapter 3 of the Bankruptcy Code deals
Q88: Which of the following would not be
Q90: A debtor will be denied a Chapter
Q90: Non-bankruptcy compromises to give debtors relief while
Q92: Under Chapter _, certain debts of individuals
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents