Solved

In the Case of Hamilton V.Lanning,the Court

Question 85

Multiple Choice

In the case of Hamilton v.Lanning,the court:


A) stated that the Bankruptcy Code did not define the term "projected disposable income" until enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.
B) dealt with the issue of liquidation of nonexempt assets under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
C) found that when a bankruptcy court calculates a Chapter 13 debtor's projected disposable income, the court may adjust for changes in the debtor's income or expenses that are virtually certain instead of using a mechanical approach.
D) agreed with the petitioner's argument that a debtor's projected disposable income should be determined using a mechanical approach of multiplying past average monthly disposable income by the number of months in a debtor's plan.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents