In Ricci v.Destefano,the Supreme Court ruled:
a.the city could be liable for disparate-impact discrimination only if the exams were not job related and consistent with business necessity or if there were an equally valid, less-discriminatory alternative that served the city's needs but that the city would not adopt.
b.that the race-based action like the city's in this case is impermissible under Title VII, without exception.
c.Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits only intentional, but not unintentional, discrimination.
d.the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits policies or practices that produce a disparate impact.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Ricci v.Destefano,the Supreme Court ruled:
a.the city could be liable for disparate-impact discrimination only if the exams were not job related and consistent with business necessity or if there were an equally valid, less-discriminatory alternative that served the city's needs but that the city would not adopt.
b.that the race-based action like the city's in this case is impermissible under Title VII, without exception.
c.Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits only intentional, but not unintentional, discrimination.
d.the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits policies or practices that produce a disparate impact.

In Ricci V.Destefano,the Supreme Court Ruled