When might a manager be justified in revising a standard rather than taking corrective action to remedy a significant performance deviation?
A)When the standard is unrealistic
B)When performance falls far short of the standard
C)When performance falls slightly short of the standard
D)When performance exceeds the standard

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A manager may need to revise a standard if it is found to be unrealistic and unachievable. In such a case, continuously falling short of the standard despite corrective action would not be effective in improving performance, and revising the standard would be the better option. However, in all other cases where there is a significant performance deviation, taking corrective action to remedy the deviation would be the best course of action.

When Might a Manager Be Justified in Revising a Standard