The Ultramares v. Touche case of 1933 held that a cause of action based on negligence could not be maintained by a third party who was not in contractual privity; however, it did leave open the possibility that:
A) Third parties that were "foreseeable" may sue for ordinary negligence
B) Third parties may sue if one of the parties in contractual privity allowed it to
C) Third parties may sue in the case of fraud or constructive fraud
D) Third parties who used the financial statements may sue
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Which of the following is NOT one
Q12: A privity relationship means that:
A) A party
Q13: In the U.S., if the auditor can
Q14: The unique aspect of auditors' legal liability
Q15: Which of the following would normally be
Q17: The Rosenblum case ruling was of concern
Q18: An audit engagement letter:
A) Offers an auditor's
Q19: Which of the following is NOT one
Q20: The Credit Alliance v. Arthur Andersen &
Q21: Which of the following is NOT a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents