In ______________________,the Supreme Court ruled that a child asking to speak to his probation officer was not the equivalent of asking for an attorney.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that a suspect must be informed of their right to an attorney and right to remain silent before interrogation. California v. Prysock and People v. Lara do not pertain to this issue. In Fare v. Michael C., the Supreme Court ruled that a juvenile asking to speak to their probation officer did not constitute a request for an attorney, and therefore did not trigger the Miranda warning requirement.

In ______________________,The Supreme Court Ruled That a Child Asking to Speak