As this chapter makes clear, there are many issues within hominin evolution that remain open to debate. One of them regards the Kenyanthropus fossil found by Maeve Leakey, who argues that at least two hominin lineages existed as far back as 3.5 million years (the other being A.afarensis) . Taxonomic "splitters" tend to agree with her interpretation, while taxonomic "lumpers" disagree. These two interpretations highlight
A) the distinction between those who stress diversity and divergence, and those who focus on similarities across fossil finds.
B) that more fossil evidence isn't necessarily better, because it only leads to more misinterpretation.
C) the distinction between creationists and evolutionists.
D) the difference between those who consider bipedalism as the key hominin feature, and those that consider large brain size the key feature.
E) that not all paleoanthropologists value human diversity.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Interestingly,some of the physical markers that have
Q5: In 2009,a newly reported Ardipithecus find-a fairly
Q6: Bipedalism,considered a key defining characteristic that differentiated
Q8: All of the following are true about
Q9: Sahelanthropus tchadensis,or Toumai,
A) may be the oldest
Q10: All of the following about Ardipithecus kadabba
Q12: What was the major hominin group that
Q13: What is the significance of Kenyanthropus,a 3.5-million-year-old
Q14: Although the first hominins appeared late in
Q17: Which of the following is NOT a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents