Using the statement Our incompetent CEO should be replaced without supplying solid evidence is an example of
A) circular reasoning.
B) logical reasoning.
C) begging the question.
D) post hoc (after, thus, because).

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is an example of begging the question because it assumes that the CEO is incompetent without providing any evidence or logical reasoning to support the claim. It is circular in nature because it assumes what it is trying to prove, making the argument fallacious. Logical reasoning would involve providing evidence and reasons for why the CEO should be replaced, rather than simply making a statement without any support. Post hoc reasoning involves drawing a false cause and effect relationship between two events that are not necessarily related.

Using the Statement Our Incompetent CEO Should Be Replaced Without