Rogers owned property which he discovered was contaminated with hazardous waste.He learned that twenty years earlier,Smith's Manufacturing had owned the property and used it as a disposal site for manufacturing chemicals.Rogers also learned that Jones' Trucking had hauled the chemicals to the site under contract with Smith.Under these circumstances,which,if any,of the parties can be liable for the costs of cleaning up the site under CERCLA?
A) Smith is potentially liable under CERCLA.
B) Rogers is potentially liable under CERCLA.
C) Smith and Jones are potentially liable under CERCLA.
D) Rogers,Smith,and Jones are all potentially liable under CERCLA. Under the given circumstances,Rogers,Smith,and Jones are all potentially liable under CERCLA.The EPA has the authority to require that a site be cleaned up by those persons who were responsible for it,either as the owner or operator of the site,a transporter of wastes to the site,or the owner of wastes deposited at the site.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: The wetland permit program:
A)is administered by the
Q41: NIMBY stands for:
A)a national and international measurement
Q42: "Community Right to Know" legislation:
A)requires an industry
Q43: When is a discharge permit required under
Q45: Under the RCRA,most of the wastes defined
Q45: What is the consequence of placing a
Q47: Explain the Clean Air Act's approach for
Q48: Describe Superfund's "Community Right to Know" requirement.
Q49: Employees of a company that illegally disposes
Q50: What are the major requirements a person
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents