Simons purchased a home for $120,000,insuring it for $120,000 with Mutual Life.She later purchased a $60,000 policy from Equitable.The home was totally destroyed by fire while it still had a fair market value of $120,000 and the losses amounted to $30,000.Under these circumstances,which of the following statements is true?
A) Simons can claim the damages only from Mutual Life as its policy amount is greater.
B) She cannot claim insurance from either as policies with pro rata clauses cover only partial losses.
C) Simons can recover $180,000-the total of both policies,as part of his insurance contract.
D) Simons cannot claim more than $60,000 from Equitable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: An important distinction between valid insurance contracts
Q18: In life insurance policies,the person who purchases
Q21: In cases in which the insured has
Q22: Which of the following insurance contracts is
Q23: This clause bars the insurer from contesting
Q25: Which of the following is not covered
Q26: If Geoff makes a fraudulent statement about
Q28: Douglas obtained a $100,000 insurance policy on
Q29: The "incontestability clause" found in life insurance
Q34: _ generally require that the insured pay
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents