I.M.Handy was the sole proprietor of Handy's Upholstery Service.Green brought some items of furniture to Handy's place of business and left them there for the purpose of having them reupholstered.Handy and Green did not have any specific discussion concerning what Handy would charge for his services.Under these circumstances:
A) a bailment for the sole benefit of the bailor was created even though the parties did not specifically discuss compensation.
B) a bailment for mutual benefit was created which entitles Handy to compensation from Green for the reasonable value of his services.
C) a bailment was not created and hence,Handy is not liable to any payment.
D) a bailment was created only for the storage of property for which Handy is entitled only to storage services.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: When Martha of Martha's Homemade Pies gives
Q34: Which of the following statements is true
Q35: Which of the following statements is true
Q36: If a bailee misdelivers the bailed property
Q37: The statute that allows finders of property
Q39: When the finder of a lost property
Q40: Identify the statement that is true of
Q43: What are the differences between a gift
Q43: Common carriers:
A)are never allowed to limit their
Q45: What are the basic duties of a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents