The destruction of items that the promisor intended to use in performing would not excuse nonperformance if it just made performance more difficult for the promisor.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The destruction of items intended for performance does not excuse nonperformance if it only makes performance more difficult, as the promisor is still expected to fulfill their contractual obligations unless performance becomes impossible.

The Destruction of Items That the Promisor Intended to Use