On April 1,2005 Parker entered an oral contract with Wilkins in which Parker promised to work for Wilkins for three years for a salary of $40,000 per year.On April 5,2005,Wilkins called Parker and repudiated the contract,stating that he had decided not to hire him after all.If Parker sues Wilkins for breach of contract:
A) Wilkins will win because the contract violates the statute of frauds.
B) Wilkins will lose because the contract is enforceable.
C) Wilkins will win because the contract violates the parol evidence rule.
D) Wilkins will lose because his main purpose in promising to hire Parker was to benefit himself.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: A contract may be enforceable if promissory
Q3: Under the E-Sign Act,digital signatures are given
Q4: As illustrated by the Parol evidence rule,when
Q5: The parties had to rely on the
Q6: In a guaranty contract,the guarantor's promise must
Q8: When parties to an oral contract have
Q9: If one of the parties drafted the
Q10: The student formerly known as Jim prefers
Q11: Oral contracts that come under the provisions
Q12: A person's promise made on an original
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents