An auction house puts a painting up for sale,which it believed to be and represented as Pablo Picasso's "Acrobat and Young Harlequin." An anonymous Japanese buyer,also believing it to be Picasso's original work,bought it for $50 million.Sometime later the buyer had the painting appraised for insurance purposes,and the appraiser discovered that it was a forgery worth only a few thousand dollars.Can the buyer rescind the contract? If so,on what basis?
A) The buyer cannot rescind because his mistake was negligent; he should have investigated the authenticity of the work before bidding on it.
B) The buyer can rescind on the basis of unilateral mistake.
C) The buyer cannot rescind because the auction house did not intentionally mislead him about the authenticity of the painting.
D) The buyer can rescind on the basis of mutual mistake.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: The practical difference between the remedies for
Q39: When Steve convinces Tom to buy a
Q40: Today,many courts recognize which of the following
Q41: Harry owns a Cadillac and a Porsche.Bob
Q42: Sargent put $5,000 worth of stocks and
Q45: Mutual mistakes may arise:
A)only when parties unintentionally
Q46: There is no voluntary consent in a
Q47: Why do courts require justifiable reliance in
Q48: How do cases of mistake differ from
Q50: When might a court grant relief for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents