Which is the best critique of the statement: "Nuclear energy will save our atmosphere."? The statement is
A) true,because nuclear power plants do not pollute the atmosphere.We should replace coal-burning plants with nuclear plants and we'd breathe easier.
B) ridiculous,because there is no proof that our atmosphere needs saving.Why should we take on the nuclear waste disposal problem to solve a problem that does not exist?
C) true,because nuclear power plants release fewer pollutants into the air than coal-burning plants.However,it is also false because we have no information indicating what percentage of coal-burning plants would have to be replaced with nuclear plants to make a significant difference.
D) false, because it is not clear that there is an atmospheric problem. If there is a problem, it cannot be as bad as the potential danger of expanding the nuclear threat on this planet with more nuclear power plants.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q51: Which factor will oppose the growth of
Q52: Which example is both a type of
Q53: As compared to high-level nuclear waste,low-level nuclear
Q54: In which organ does radioactive I-131 accumulate?
A)liver
B)pituitary
Q55: Which radiation source is the biggest contributor
Q57: Which factor will support the growth of
Q58: The annual radiation dose for most citizens
Q59: Which form of radiation has the highest
Q60: Approximately what percentage of the electrical energy
Q61: Although the nuclear reactors used to produce
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents