Assume Pollutex Inc. produces paper in its plant located on Lake Ontario, half a mile away from CleanAir Camping. Pollutex employs an obsolete production process, dumping scum in the lake. The camp has experienced a steady decline in the number of attendees since Pollutex moved nearby. In particular, the owners forecast that CleanAir Camping will generate a profit of only $50,000 a year in the future, which is $150,000 less than the one generated before Pollutex moved nearby. A cleaner production process is available, which would not require dumping the scum in the lake. However, converting the plant would increase yearly costs by $100,000. Is the current situation Pareto efficient?
A) Yes, since there is no alternative that would make CleanAir better off without hurting Pollutex, and vice versa.
B) No, as Pollutex could convert its plant and make CleanAir better off by $150,000.
C) No. In fact, CleanAir owners could pay Pollutex a sum between $100,000 and $150,000 a year to convert its plant, and increase profits between $0 and $50,000.
D) No. In fact, Pollutex owners could pay CleanAir a sum between $100,000 and $150,000 a year to convert its plant, and increase profits between $0 and $50,000.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Assume the demand function for scooters is
Q2: If demand is represented by Qd =
Q4: Faith and Hope are 30 year old
Q5: Tom and Jerry have been roommates for
Q5: Markets can give a buyer everything a
Q7: A competitive equilibrium price guarantees that:
A) consumers
Q9: Suppose Sam and Kevin can produce pens
Q10: Assume the market for ceiling fans is
Q11: Assume the demand function for basketballs is
Q13: A bunch of elementary school kids sit
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents