Which of the following was the result in Campbell v.Robinson,the case in the text in which the plaintiff claimed that the defendant wrongfully refused to return an engagement ring when the marriage was cancelled?
A) That the defendant was entitled to keep the ring because the termination of the engagement was the plaintiff's fault.
B) That the defendant was entitled to keep the ring because it was a completed gift when she initially received it.
C) That a jury question was presented as to whether the plaintiff made an absolute gift of the ring to the defendant after the termination of the engagement.
D) The under principles of equity, the plaintiff was entitled to keep the ring, but only if she paid the defendant ½ of its value and that, otherwise, it would be sold with the proceeds split between the parties.
E) That because the termination of the engagement was the defendant's fault, she was required to return the ring.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Ownership of property is referred to as
Q5: A promise to make a gift is
Q10: Unless a bailment is gratuitous,the bailee has
Q11: Fixtures are treated like _ property.
A) Real
B)
Q12: Which of the following is movable property
Q13: Some states allow innkeepers to avoid strict
Q14: Parties to a bailment contract can limit
Q16: Which of the following types of property
Q17: Which of the following is property that
Q19: Which of the following is a type
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents