Which of the following is true if it is determined that harm befell bailed property due to an "act of God"?
A) The bailee is liable for harm to the bailed property arising out of the bailee's ordinary or gross negligence.
B) The bailee is liable for harm to the bailed property arising only out of the bailee's gross negligence.
C) The bailee is liable for harm to the bailed property caused by even the slightest lack of due care on the part of the bailee.
D) The bailee is strictly liable for harm to the bailed property.
E) The bailee is not liable for harm to the bailed property.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

If the property is harmed by an unpreventable "act of God," there is no liability on the part of the bailee under any circumstances.

Which of the Following Is True If It Is Determined