Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Robert

Which of the following was the result on appeal in Robert M.Tafoya v.Dee S.Perkins involving a sale of partnership property and the applicable statute of limitations on an action for an accounting when there was no agreement on the matter between the withdrawing partner and other partner involved?

A) That the plaintiff's suit was timely because the statute of limitations on an action for an accounting as to a partnership does not begin to run until all property owned by the partnership is sold and that the statute of limitations, computed as of that point, is six years.
B) That the plaintiff's suit was timely because the statute of limitations on an action for an accounting as to a partnership does not begin to run until all property owned by the partnership is sold and that the statute of limitations, computed as of that point, is two years.
C) That the plaintiff's suit was timely because there is no statute of limitations on an accounting as to partnership property so long as one of the partners is living.
D) That the plaintiff's suit was untimely because the statute of limitations on an action for an accounting as to a partnership begins to run when the withdrawing partner ceases to be associated with the business resulting in dissolution and that the statute of limitations, computed at that point, is six years.
E) That the plaintiff's suit was untimely because the statute of limitations on an action for an accounting as to a partnership begins to run when the withdrawing partner ceases to be associated with the business resulting in dissolution and that the statute of limitations, computed at that point, is two years.