Which of the following was the result in Ackerman v.Sobol Family Partnership,LLP the case in the text involving whether the plaintiffs were bound by representations of their attorney regarding settlement that they had not approved?
A) That the agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not lead the opposing defense attorneys reasonably to believe that the plaintiffs' attorney had full and final authority to settle the litigation.
B) That the agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not signed it.
C) That the agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not given the attorney express authority to enter into the agreement.
D) That the agreement would be enforced because the plaintiffs' attorney had express authority to enter into the agreement.
E) That the agreement would be enforced because the plaintiffs' attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: If a principal agrees to hire no
Q13: The law assumes that the principal is
Q14: Which of the following is true regarding
Q17: If an agent breaches duties owed to
Q17: A gratuitous agent is one who acts
Q18: An individual who lacks contractual capacity may
Q18: When parties form an agency relationship by
Q19: Which of the following is the most
Q37: Under which of the following does a
Q44: Which of the following is false regarding
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents