Which of the following was the result in Cameron v.Ewing,the case in the text involving whether monthly proceeds from a reverse mortgage were subject to garnishment?
A) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the payments did not constitute earned income.
B) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the defendant's estate was ultimately liable to repay the monies received to the extent repayment could be generated from sale of the property.
C) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because it would be against public policy to find as such.
D) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment because the payments constituted debts due the defendant.
E) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment based on public policy and also that the claimant was entitled to the full amount of the monthly payments.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: A[n] _ is a judicial order authorizing
Q31: According to the text,which of the following
Q33: What does the Federal Consumer Credit Protection
Q34: Which of the following is a term
Q36: Which of the following was the result
Q38: Which of the following is a claim
Q39: Which of the following is a claim
Q40: Which of the following exemptions permits a
Q45: Which of the following is a court-ordered
Q68: Which of the following is true if
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents