Which of the following was the result in Welchert v.American Cyanamid Inc.,the case in the text in which the plaintiffs claimed breach of an express warranty after herbicide manufactured by the defendant allegedly caused crop damage,and the issue was whether the Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act preempted claims involving the product's label?
A) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted by FIFRA.
B) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was not preempted by FIFRA.
C) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought money damages as opposed to equitable relief.
D) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought equitable relief as opposed to money damages.
E) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only because it was not filed in a timely manner.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Express warranties may be found in advertisements.
Q5: Which of the following was the court's
Q6: Which of the following are types of
Q6: To use common law language a[n] _
Q9: An express warranty is any description of
Q9: The Magnuson-Moss Act requires a full warranty
Q12: To invoke the implied warranty of merchantability,the
Q13: In order to disclaim the implied warranty
Q15: The UCC adopted the common law of
Q18: The UCC assumes that the seller has
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents