Which of the Following Best Expresses the Court's Opinion in the Case

Which of the following best expresses the court's opinion in the case nugget Jackson v.Bumble Bee Seafoods Inc.,in which the plaintiff sued after small fish bones were found in canned tuna fish the plaintiff ate?

A) That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish and should have been expected.
B) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.
D) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of merchantability because even through bones are not a foreign substance to fish, they are not expected in small pieces of tuna fish.
E) That the plaintiff could not recover because no food has warranties attached to it.