Which of the following is true regarding Roland's claim that Selina had no right to withhold his furniture?
A) Roland is correct. Selina was required to deliver the furniture, but she retained the right to sue him for any deficiency.
B) Roland is correct but only because of the special UCC exception for consumer goods.
C) Roland is incorrect. Selina had a right to withhold the furniture.
D) Roland is incorrect but only if Selina can prove that she had no reason to believe that he was a credit risk prior to signing the contract of sale.
E) Roland is correct because of federal consumer protection laws.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Sometimes a buyer breaches the contract or lease before the seller has delivered the goods. For instance, the buyer or lessee might fail to pay according to the terms of the agreement. UCC Sections 2-703(a) and 2A-523(1)(c) allow sellers or lessors to withhold delivery of goods when the buyer or lessee is in breach.

Which of the Following Is True Regarding Roland's Claim That