Which of the following is true regarding Harry's assertion that under the parol evidence rule he had the right to identify the house referenced in the contract?
A) Harry is correct.
B) Harry is incorrect because under the parol evidence rule, Rebecca, as the buyer, would be allowed to identify the subject matter in the event of a discrepancy.
C) Harry is incorrect because under the parol evidence rule, the judge would likely allow oral evidence regarding the house at issue in order to clarify an ambiguity.
D) Harry is incorrect because the parol evidence rule would not apply in situations involving an ambiguity.
E) Harry is incorrect because the parol evidence rule would not apply in the absence of a merger clause.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

To reach the most accurate interpretation of the original agreement, the court allows evidence, even if it is oral, for the sole purpose of clarifying, not changing, ambiguous contractual terms.

Which of the Following Is True Regarding Harry's Assertion That