What did the U.S.Supreme Court rule in Buckeye Check Cashing Inc.,v.Cardegnaet,the case in the text involving whether the court or the arbitrator should determine decide the issues of a case when illegality in relation to a contract is claimed?
A) That an arbitrator should address charges of illegality involving either an arbitration provision or a contract as a whole.
B) That when an arbitration provision in a contract is not specifically challenged, an arbitrator should address a charge of illegality to a contract as a whole.
C) That when an arbitration provision in a contract is not specifically challenged, a court should address a charge of illegality to a contract as a whole.
D) That the court should address charges of illegality involving either an arbitration provision or a contract as a whole.
E) That whether a court or an arbitrator should address charges of illegality involving either an arbitration provision or a contract as a whole depends upon the first to file rule.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Court concluded that when an agreement as a whole, but not specifically its arbitration provisions, is challenged, the arbitration provisions are enforceable apart from the remainder of the contract, and the challenge to the legality of the contract itself should therefore be considered by an arbitrator, not a court.

What Did the U