In the dispute between Sally and the owner of Dings and Dents,which of the following is true regarding the effect of Sally turning 18 before she attempts to disaffirm the contract?
A) So long as, after reaching the age of majority, Sally did not state orally or in writing that she intended to be bound by the contract, then she did not commit an express ratification.
B) Sally was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it.
C) An implied ratification occurs when parents agree to accept the debt entered into by a minor.
D) If Sally caused any damage whatsoever to the car, she was said to have impliedly ratified the contract.
E) Sally was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it so long as no damage was done; but if she did any damage to the car, as a matter of law, she is said to have impliedly ratified it.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Once a person reaches the age of majority, he or she may ratify, or legally affirm, contracts made as a minor through express or implied ratification. An express ratification occurs when, after reaching the age of majority, the person states orally or in writing that he or she intends to be bound by the contract entered into as a minor.

In the Dispute Between Sally and the Owner of Dings