Which of the following was the result in Alexander v.Lafayette Crime Stoppers Inc.,the case in the text in which the plaintiffs sued for collection of reward money offered to catch a serial killer by the defending publications,and the publications defended on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to provide notice as required by the reward offers because the plaintiffs provided relevant information to law enforcement,not the defendants?
A) That the plaintiffs accepted the reward offers by performance when they provided information to law enforcement and were, therefore, entitled to recover.
B) That the plaintiffs were entitled to prevail because by law they were required to contact law enforcement, not the defendants.
C) That defendants did not receive acceptance of the reward offer and that, therefore, no contract was formed.
D) That defendants revoked the reward offer before it was accepted and that, therefore, no contract was formed.
E) That reward offers cannot constitute offers and that, therefore, no contract was formed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Courts interpret contracts using an objective standard.
Q10: The _ terms of a contract are
Q10: Only the offeree to whom an offer
Q13: An "instructed authorization" occurs if the means
Q14: What was the result in the case
Q16: Under the Mailbox Rule,a valid contract has
Q17: What was the result in the Opening
Q17: Once an offer is made,an offeror has
Q21: Which of the following terms would be
Q29: What was the result in the case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents