What is the most likely result regarding the company's position that it had no duty to warn of the risk of dizziness because it complied with FDA requirements?
A) That the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) establishes both a floor and a ceiling for drug regulation and that no additional warning requirements regarding dizziness could be imposed.
B) That absent clear evidence that the FDA would not have approved a change in the warning to include dizziness, a state law cause of action based on failure to warn would be allowed.
C) That no warning regarding dizziness could be required in addition to FDA approved warnings because dizziness is not a serious condition causing a "black box" type of warning involving risk of serious injury death.
D) That a state law cause of action would be allowed to go forward only upon the submission of clear evidence that a regulatory agency of the state had requested that the warning label be revised to warn of dizziness.
E) That while the plaintiff could go forward with a federal claim in relation to the lack of a warning regarding dizziness, a state law cause of action would be barred because of the company's compliance with FDA regulations.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: Which of the following causes of action
Q49: As recognized by the court in Sperry-New
Q49: Which of the following is the type
Q50: Which of the following is true regarding
Q51: Under the Restatement (Third) of Torts, which
Q52: Which of the following is true regarding
Q53: The defense that Belinda waited too long
Q55: Paul was very excited about his first
Q57: What type of warranty,if any,did the salesperson
Q59: Without considering any statements made by either
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents