For his birthday,Paul's family purchased for Paul,who tips the scales at over 250 pounds,an exercise bicycle from a popular sports retailer in his community.The first time that Paul hopped on the bike,it collapsed,throwing him to the floor and severely bruising his ankle.Paul wants to sue for his injuries.He has an expert in exercise equipment examine the bicycle.The expert tells him that the bike was properly manufactured.It was not,however,designed for individuals weighing over 250 pounds.There was a warning to that effect in the brochure that came with the bicycle,but Paul's family threw that away along with the packaging; and Paul never saw it.Is there any negligence theory under which Paul can recover? If so,what is it,and what must Paul demonstrate to win?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q46: Which of the following causes of action
Q57: What type of warranty,if any,did the salesperson
Q59: Without considering any statements made by either
Q60: Which of the following is true regarding
Q61: What four considerations did the U.S.Supreme Court
Q63: Courts using the market share theory generally
Q65: List the seven factors set forth in
Q67: Describe the two approaches taken by courts
Q85: In most states,what must a plaintiff prove
Q89: Define and describe the three commonly used
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents