Which of the following was the result in U.S.v.Ruiz,the case in the text involving the defending deputy superintendent of New Mexico's insurance division who was convicted of offenses including mail fraud after he told insurers that they could avoid paying the fines for violation of licensing requirements if they contributed to certain charities?
A) That although the defendant violated certain laws, he did not violate the mail fraud statute because he did not himself mail fraudulent solicitations which is required for the offense of mail fraud.
B) That although the defendant used the mail to provide the illegal option to insurers, that in and of itself was insufficient to establish mail fraud.
C) That because the defendant used the mail to provide the illegal option to insurers, that in and of itself was sufficient to establish mail fraud.
D) That proof that the defendant directed that donations be made directly to charities established the reasonably foreseeable result that the mail would be used which was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
E) That proof that the defendant directed that donations be made directly to charities established the reasonably foreseeable result that the mail would be used but that such foreseeability was insufficient to support his conviction.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q60: Assuming the requisite elements are proven,which of
Q60: A defendant can use the _ defense
Q62: Upon which amendment did Martin rely in
Q64: Of which of the following offenses,if any,is
Q66: Which offense is Sally guilty of,if any,in
Q67: Of what offense,if any,is Alice guilty of
Q68: List the elements necessary to establish bribery
Q71: What was the result in the case
Q72: Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which of the
Q85: Discuss the four alternative ways, in addition
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents