Dart Corp.dismissed Ritz as its general sales agent.Dart notified all of Ritz's known customers by letter.Bing Corp. ,a retail outlet located outside of Ritz's previously assigned sales territory,had never dealt with Ritz.However,Bing knew of Ritz as a result of various business contacts.After his dismissal,Ritz sold Bing goods,to be delivered by Dart,and received from Bing a cash deposit for 20 percent of the purchase price.It was not unusual for an agent in Ritz's previous position to receive cash deposits.In an action by Bing against Dart on the sales contract,which of the following is true?
A) Bing will win the lawsuit because Dart's notice was inadequate to terminate Ritz's apparent authority.
B) Bing will win the lawsuit because Dart,the principal,is an insurer of Ritz's,the agent's acts.
C) Bing will lose the lawsuit,because Ritz lacked any express or implied authority to make the contract.
D) Bing will lose the lawsuit because Bing was negligent while making a contract with Ritz.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: A principal is liable for the misrepresentations
Q14: An agent who purports to act for
Q27: Susan is hired to manage a business.This
Q28: Ralph,the owner of a medium-sized business,which is
Q29: _ arises when the principal's manifestations cause
Q30: Ordinarily,an agent is not liable for unauthorized
Q31: Implied ratification arises when:
A)the principal's conduct justifies
Q36: Which of the following is true of
Q38: _ means that the principal's rights and
Q50: A principal is _ if a third
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents