April and Brian entered into a completely integrated written contract.Before the written contract was completed,April made an oral statement to Brian regarding the terms of the contract.This statement was not contained in the written contract.Under the parol evidence rule,evidence of April's oral statement would be admissible if it were used to:
A) create a completely new agreement.
B) introduce an ambiguous term in the written contract.
C) prove an additional term consistent with the written agreement.
D) change the terms of the written contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: Which of the following is true regarding
Q44: Which of the following is admissible with
Q47: The Parol Evidence rule is relevant only
Q48: King sent Foster,a real estate developer,a signed
Q49: A fully "integrated" contract under the parol
Q51: Mr.Green and Mr.Blue contract orally to transfer
Q52: The underlying purpose of the statute of
Q53: With regard to an agreement for the
Q55: If it is not indicated in the
Q58: The Electronic Signatures in Global and National
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents