CW,Inc.publishes Consumer Watchdog,a magazine whose articles consist of the writers' personal experiences with and reactions to a variety of products.In the June 1997 issue of Consumer Watchdog,a review included this statement: "Fungus Co.'s 'Fungo' brand athlete's foot powder doesn't cut the mustard in comparison to most athlete's foot powders on the market--and I've tried them all,sports fans.Fungo fails to attack athlete's foot with enough force because the product doesn't contain AF88,the active ingredient in any decent athlete's foot powder." In fact,Fungo contains as much AF88 as any other athlete's foot powder on the market.Fungus Co.has filed suit against Nex and CW on the theory that the above statements violated section 43(a)of the Lanham Act.On these facts,should Fungus win the section 43(a)case? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q61: The _ that the plaintiff is required
Q62: Which of the following is true of
Q63: Which of the following is also termed
Q65: Discuss one criticism of the first-to-file policy.
Q66: Why are noncompetition agreements disfavored by the
Q68: What is patent infringement?
Q73: Which of the following characterizes section 43
Q74: In a case of intentional interference,a defendant
Q76: In a lawsuit for intentional interference with
Q87: What is the first-to-invent rule?
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents