Jack was an employee of ABC Corp.Harry,the president of ABC,had reasonable grounds to believe that Jack had stolen money from the corporation.ABC fired Jack.One month later,Jack applied for employment at DEF Corp.The vice president for Human Relations at DEF contacted Harry and asked about Jack's performance at ABC.Harry responded,"I believe that Jack stole money while working here".DEF declined to hire Jack.Jack later discovered what Harry had said,and is now suing Harry for defamation.What is the likely outcome of this case?
A) Jack will win because Harry's statement harmed him.
B) Jack will win because Harry did not have absolute proof that Jack had stolen money.
C) Harry will win because he had a conditional privilege to make that statement.
D) Harry will win because he had an absolute privilege to comment on a former employee's performance.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Defamation liability requires publication of the defamatory
Q21: Davis throws a dagger at Smith,intending to
Q21: Libel is distinct from slander,in that,libel:
A)involves views
Q23: Store owners' "conditional privilege" defense against intentional
Q24: Nuisance involves the invasion of another's property.
Q25: What is the standard of proof that
Q29: Which of the following is slander rather
Q33: Which of the following characterizes false imprisonment?
A)Unintentional
Q37: Humorous or satirical accounts ordinarily are not
Q39: _ is defined as the desire to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents