Police detective Brenda Judd had a hunch that Beats,Inc. ,a retail seller of stereo equipment and related supplies,was involved in a drug-smuggling operation.In order to acquire evidence confirming her hunch,Judd posed as an ordinary consumer when she entered the Beats store.She slipped out of the "public" part of the store and proceeded down a hall to an office whose closed door was marked "Private.No Entry without Authorization from Manager." She entered the office which was unoccupied,looked through files,and located documentary evidence indicating that Beats was indeed involved in an illegal operation.The evidence obtained by Judd furnished the primary basis for drug-smuggling and drug-dealing charges that are now pending against Beats.Beats has filed a pretrial motion asking the court to suppress the evidence obtained by Judd in her search of the office.Should the evidence be suppressed? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q52: The expansion of corporate criminal liability in
Q58: Which of the following characterizes searches?
A) It
Q59: Average Corp.was convicted of violating the federal
Q61: The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act's
Q62: Nigel is the sole proprietor of a
Q64: Leviathan Corp.has filed a civil Racketeer Influenced
Q67: Which of the following characterizes the Computer
Q70: Kathy was accused of securities fraud.During the
Q85: Sal Conelli is the president and sole
Q88: Since the exclusionary rule has often resulted
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents