Bubble Wrap Co.(BWC) ,an Atlanta corporation,has its principal place of business in New York.John,a resident of Florida,asserted on his website that BWC is engaged in ongoing criminal activity,scams,and phishing.BWC sued John in the U.S.District Court for the District of New York,alleging defamation and injury to BWC's business in New York.John filed a motion to dismiss the case alleging that neither subject-matter nor in personam jurisdiction existed.The court granted the defendant's motion and dismissed the case because:
A) BWC could not meet its burden of establishing sufficient minimum contacts.
B) BWC did not have subject-matter jurisdiction.
C) BWC neither had subject-matter jurisdiction nor in personam jurisdiction.
D) publishing of those statements did not amount to defamation and thus no injury was caused to BWC's business.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: The defendant must wait until after the
Q10: The doctrine of certiorari jurisdiction makes it
Q11: For federal district court diversity jurisdiction to
Q15: The plaintiff can sue the defendant in
Q15: Generally,forum selection clauses in form agreements are
Q17: In rem jurisdiction is based only on
Q19: For a state trial court to have
Q20: Brennan sues Melissa for breach of contract.In
Q20: The assertion of specific in personam jurisdiction
Q21: A counterclaim differs from an affirmative defense
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents