Greg sues Ned in an effort to get title to some land claimed by Ned and located inside the state of Texas.Ned has never been to Texas in his life,has never had any contacts of any kind with the state,and refuses to appear in Texas to defend against Greg's suit.Later,after Greg wins a default judgment against Ned,Ned shows up in Texas to claim that the judgment was invalid because he was totally outside Texas,hence Texas courts had no jurisdiction over him,and for this reason they could not affect his rights to the land.Is Ned right? Why or why not? Assume that subject-matter jurisdiction exists.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q35: For federal "diversity" jurisdiction to exist:
A)the case
Q41: The motion to dismiss for failure to
Q45: Does the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)override a
Q46: In the form of alternative dispute resolution
Q46: The right of _ is available for
Q47: A method of alternative dispute resolution in
Q51: At a _,the judge meets informally with
Q56: Discovery generally takes place without a need
Q60: Dillon's,a discount retailer with over 500 employees,includes
Q86: What two kinds of jurisdiction are necessary
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents